Skip to main content

Going Parallel With Parallel Extension For .Net 3.5

Now a days, almost all computers being used have multiple cores, for an example technologies like dual core.But, although you have dual core, generally you write programs that run on a single core, this does not utilize the total power of the multiple CPU or core that you have.
This is exactly the power what Microsoft Parallel Extensions for .NET Framework 3.5 (a.k.a PFX).gives you.
With PFX, you can write flexible programs that would take advantage of utilizing multiple cores in the environment it is deployed in, giving you high performance and scalabilty.
PFX comes in 2 "Flavours", Task Parallel Library (TPL) and PLINQ.
TPL gives you general APIs that can be used to make your program run in parallel, for an example , take the for loop below
for(int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++ )
{ //Do something that is not dependent on other iterations }

the for loop does 1000000 iterations, and does something that is not dependent on other iterations. Running this program in a mulit core machine , will only utilize one CPU and not at it's best and eventually the response time is also high.
This for loop can be easily made to run in parallel, as the iterations are not dependent on each other.
With PFX, you can re-write your program like this

Parallel.For(0, 1000000, i => (/*Do somthing */));

This program would run faster as PFX assigns chunks of iterations to the mulitple CPUs. You would also see that the almost 100% of CPUs power is used if you are on a dual core.
Parallel is a class in the PFX that gives you high level static APIs for looping and invoking in parallel, you can have a look at the docs if you want more... :)
PLINQ on the other hand, is a way to make your queries run in parallel, this applies to in-memory objects and xml. Queries that hit databases is not a candidate for parallisam and hench cannot be used with PLINQ.You can find some introductory samples and videos at the MSDN Parallel Computing section.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hosting WCF services on IIS or Windows Services?

There came one of those questions from the client whether to use II7 hosting or windows service hosting for WCF services. I tried recollecting a few points and thought of writing it down. WCF applications can be hosted in 2 main ways - In a Windows service - On IIS 7 and above When WCF was first released, IIS 6 did not support hosting WCF applications that support Non-HTTP communication like Net.TCP or Net.MSMQ and developers had to rely on hosting these services on Windows Services. With the release of IIS 7, it was possible to deploy these Non-Http based applications also on IIS 7. Following are the benefits of using IIS 7 to host WCF applications Less development effort Hosting on Windows service, mandates the creating of a Windows service installer project on windows service and writing code to instantiate the service, whereas the service could just be hosted on IIS by creating an application on IIS, no further development is needed, just the service implementa

The maximum nametable character count quota (16384) has been exceeded

Some of our services were growing and the other day it hit the quote, I could not update the service references, nor was I able to run the WCFTest client. An error is diplayed saying " The maximum nametable character count quota (16384) has been exceeded " The problem was with the mex endpoint, where the XML that was sent was too much for the client to handle, this can be fixed by do the following. Just paste the lines below within the configuration section of the devenve.exe.config and the svcutil.exe.config files found at the locations C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\Common7\IDE , C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v6.0A\bin Restart IIS and you are done. The detailed error that you get is the following : Error: Cannot obtain Metadata from net.tcp://localhost:8731/ Services/SecurityManager/mex If this is a Windows (R) Communication Foundation service to which you have access, please check that you have enabled metadata publishing at the specified address. F

Finalization, Know What it Costs

This is a post about object finalization in .NET. Finalization is not as inexpensive as we think, it increases the pressure put on GC.All objects that need finalization are moved into a finalizable queue and the actual finalization happens in a separate thread. Because the objects full state may be needed, the object itself and all the object it points to are promoted to the next generation (this is needed so that GC does not clean these objects off in the current round), and these objects are cleaned up only after the following GC. Due to this reason, resources that need to be released should be wrapped in as small a finalizable object as possible, for instance if your class needs a reference to an unmanaged resource, then you should wrap the unmanaged resource in a separate finalizable class and make that a member of your class and furthermore the parent should be a non-finalizable class. This approach will assure that only the wrapped class (class that contains the unmanaged resourc