Skip to main content

Workflows and MS WF

Yesterday, I completed my training on Windows Workflow foundation.
In my opinion, it yet a new tech and provides you with a set of good features.
However, a question that was racing my mind all the time was, why the hell do you need workflows, I mean almost all programs that we write have activities and business logic within them, so what the big use of using a framework to model workflows.

These were some of the pointers the trainer think of if you need to go for workflows.

1) Activities can be clearly identified with boundaries
2) Whether to use state machine workflows can be determined if the logic is push based and not pull based
3) When rules need to be customized externally without rebuilding the system.
4) You have huge number of human interaction (to determine if you need to use state machines)
5) Long running process that can be done asynchronously without user intervention

On the other hand, MS Workflow foundation has its own advantages.
1) A cool designer support.
2) Custom activities can be created that is compiled but you can have your work flow in an external XML file, so it s configurable. The workflows loaded into the runtime by de-serelizing the XML and passing the XML reader into the CreateWorkFlow method of the runtime.
3) Workflows can be started and stopped at will, and the program state can be persisted (the property values and all), there is a default persistence service you can use with SQL server.
4) Transaction handling is cool, putting up a transaction scope would revert back the whole set of state of the workflows (even reseting member variables that we changed in the process).
5) For the stuff that the workflow cannot revert back in a transaction rollback, you can write your compensation transaction.
6) Fault handling can be done for each activity of the work flow.
7) You can host the runtime in a asmx webservice or a wcf sebservice, how you do this is also becomes simple.


We'll these are some of this stuff I remember and by the way state machine gets deprecated in .net 4.0

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hosting WCF services on IIS or Windows Services?

There came one of those questions from the client whether to use II7 hosting or windows service hosting for WCF services. I tried recollecting a few points and thought of writing it down.
WCF applications can be hosted in 2 main ways- In a Windows service- On IIS 7 and aboveWhen WCF was first released, IIS 6 did not support hosting WCF applications that support Non-HTTP communication like Net.TCP or Net.MSMQ and developers had to rely on hosting these services on Windows Services.With the release of IIS 7, it was possible to deploy these Non-Http based applications also on IIS 7. Following are the benefits of using IIS 7 to host WCF applications
Less development effort
Hosting on Windows service, mandates the creating of a Windows service installer project on windows service and writing code to instantiate the service, whereas the service could just be hosted on IIS by creating an application on IIS, no further development is needed, just the service implementation is n…

Task based Asynchronous pattern, Async & Await and .NET 4.5

One of the key features in .Net 4.5 is to write asynchronous programs much easier. So if I was to write asynchronous programs in .Net 2.0/3.5, I would either follow the event based model or the callback based model. For an example, a synchronous method that does intensive work (say the DoWork()) can be made asynchronous by using the following patterns
1) Implementing the IAsyncResult pattern. in this implementation, 2 methods are exposed for the DoWork() synchronous method, the BeginDoWork() and the EndDoWork() method. The user will call the BeingDoWork() passing in the required parameters and a callback of the delegate type AsyncCallback(IAsyncResult). The BeginDoWork() will spawn a new thread a return control back to the user. Once work is completed in the spawned method, as a last step, it will call the inform the AsyncResult implementation, which in turns will call the EndDoWork() (which is the callback that was passed in to the BeginDoWork()).
2) Implementing the event pattern. Her…

MEF (Managed Extensibility Framework), .NET 4, Dependency Injection and Plug-in Development

Almost after .Net 4 was released I remember reading about MEF (Managed Extensibility Framework), this was a framework for developers to compose their application with required dependencies. At first this looks like the Unity Container used for dependency injection, but MEF is much more than a dependency container but there is nothing stopping you from using MEF as a dependency injector.I remember around 5 years back when I was in a project that created a framework that allows developers to plug-in there modules as WinForm screens. The developer would create a set of screens with the intended functionalities and the drop this component in the bin folder of the framework and then will move on to do some painful configurations for the framework to pick up the module. Dropping the component into the bin folder and doing a bit of configuration is all that s needed for the framework to pick up display the screens. Typically, the configurations would also contain metadata about the screen.Al…