Skip to main content

Configuring mexConnections with net.tcp binding

This is one of the issues that does not explain it self to me and I could not find any help from MSDN, so I thought of sharing in the blog for future use.

I have a WCF library that is hosted in IIS, after some time we wanted to increase the max connection property of the service to 100 from the default value of 10 and also change the listenBackLog value to the same (if you dont know what these attributes do, a googling would help :0)



The service was configured with 2 endpoints, a net;tcp endpoint and the the other being the meta data exchange endpoint using mexTcpBinding.
I also configured a base address, part of the configuration file looks like this :


Host it in IIS 7 and the service does not start at all and throws up an error like this :

There is no compatible TransportManager found for URI 'net.tcp://ct-svr:8731/AuthorisationManager/Services.Security.AuthorisationManager.svc/mex'. This may be because that you have used an absolute address which points outside of the virtual application, or the binding settings of the endpoint do not match those that have been set by other services or endpoints. Note that all bindings for the same protocol should have same settings in the same application.

So, I removed the mex endpoint and it worked, but I wanted to keep the mex endpoint so after some googling and hard luck the solution was to expose the metadata through http, now the configuration file looks like this.



well, this works fine, but I still won't to know why the earlier piece of config did not work, if any ones has any idea, just put up a comment.




Comments

  1. Hi, i've the same problem !
    Cn you give me the solutions ?
    Thanks

    maxi_1972@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hosting WCF services on IIS or Windows Services?

There came one of those questions from the client whether to use II7 hosting or windows service hosting for WCF services. I tried recollecting a few points and thought of writing it down.
WCF applications can be hosted in 2 main ways- In a Windows service- On IIS 7 and aboveWhen WCF was first released, IIS 6 did not support hosting WCF applications that support Non-HTTP communication like Net.TCP or Net.MSMQ and developers had to rely on hosting these services on Windows Services.With the release of IIS 7, it was possible to deploy these Non-Http based applications also on IIS 7. Following are the benefits of using IIS 7 to host WCF applications
Less development effort
Hosting on Windows service, mandates the creating of a Windows service installer project on windows service and writing code to instantiate the service, whereas the service could just be hosted on IIS by creating an application on IIS, no further development is needed, just the service implementation is n…

Task based Asynchronous pattern, Async & Await and .NET 4.5

One of the key features in .Net 4.5 is to write asynchronous programs much easier. So if I was to write asynchronous programs in .Net 2.0/3.5, I would either follow the event based model or the callback based model. For an example, a synchronous method that does intensive work (say the DoWork()) can be made asynchronous by using the following patterns
1) Implementing the IAsyncResult pattern. in this implementation, 2 methods are exposed for the DoWork() synchronous method, the BeginDoWork() and the EndDoWork() method. The user will call the BeingDoWork() passing in the required parameters and a callback of the delegate type AsyncCallback(IAsyncResult). The BeginDoWork() will spawn a new thread a return control back to the user. Once work is completed in the spawned method, as a last step, it will call the inform the AsyncResult implementation, which in turns will call the EndDoWork() (which is the callback that was passed in to the BeginDoWork()).
2) Implementing the event pattern. Her…

MEF (Managed Extensibility Framework), .NET 4, Dependency Injection and Plug-in Development

Almost after .Net 4 was released I remember reading about MEF (Managed Extensibility Framework), this was a framework for developers to compose their application with required dependencies. At first this looks like the Unity Container used for dependency injection, but MEF is much more than a dependency container but there is nothing stopping you from using MEF as a dependency injector.I remember around 5 years back when I was in a project that created a framework that allows developers to plug-in there modules as WinForm screens. The developer would create a set of screens with the intended functionalities and the drop this component in the bin folder of the framework and then will move on to do some painful configurations for the framework to pick up the module. Dropping the component into the bin folder and doing a bit of configuration is all that s needed for the framework to pick up display the screens. Typically, the configurations would also contain metadata about the screen.Al…