Skip to main content

Entity Framework and POCO - No Support for Xml or Enums

I have been keeping up to some pace on Entity Framework, however did not try a lot on it.
So thought of doing a sample on POCO support with Entity Framework.

This was a class I used to insert to my database.
public class Task
public long TaskID { get; set; }
public XElement TaskParameter{get;set;}
public string TaskType { get; set; }
public DateTime EnquedTime { get; set; }
public DateTime CompletedTime { get; set; }
public Guid TaskIdentifier { get; set; }
public TaskStatus TaskStatus { get; set; }
public string ErrorDescription { get; set; }
public TaskPriority TaskPriority { get; set; }

The property TaskParameter is an XML column in the database and the properties TaskStatus and TaskPriority are enums and are implemented as smallint in the database

Now, I try to instantiate a context and i get this error...

"Mapping and metadata information could not be found for EntityType Task"

To find out the issue is that EF does not support entity mapping to XElement and you have to map the XML column to a string in the entity and that the EF does not support translating back to enums :(

This works perfectly fine in LINQ to SQL , but why is this feature not available in EF? Here is a post to why...

You would also get this error if , your POCO does not implement all properties that are defined in the Entity model and should match the name given in the model.


Popular posts from this blog

Hosting WCF services on IIS or Windows Services?

There came one of those questions from the client whether to use II7 hosting or windows service hosting for WCF services. I tried recollecting a few points and thought of writing it down.
WCF applications can be hosted in 2 main ways- In a Windows service- On IIS 7 and aboveWhen WCF was first released, IIS 6 did not support hosting WCF applications that support Non-HTTP communication like Net.TCP or Net.MSMQ and developers had to rely on hosting these services on Windows Services.With the release of IIS 7, it was possible to deploy these Non-Http based applications also on IIS 7. Following are the benefits of using IIS 7 to host WCF applications
Less development effort
Hosting on Windows service, mandates the creating of a Windows service installer project on windows service and writing code to instantiate the service, whereas the service could just be hosted on IIS by creating an application on IIS, no further development is needed, just the service implementation is n…

Task based Asynchronous pattern, Async & Await and .NET 4.5

One of the key features in .Net 4.5 is to write asynchronous programs much easier. So if I was to write asynchronous programs in .Net 2.0/3.5, I would either follow the event based model or the callback based model. For an example, a synchronous method that does intensive work (say the DoWork()) can be made asynchronous by using the following patterns
1) Implementing the IAsyncResult pattern. in this implementation, 2 methods are exposed for the DoWork() synchronous method, the BeginDoWork() and the EndDoWork() method. The user will call the BeingDoWork() passing in the required parameters and a callback of the delegate type AsyncCallback(IAsyncResult). The BeginDoWork() will spawn a new thread a return control back to the user. Once work is completed in the spawned method, as a last step, it will call the inform the AsyncResult implementation, which in turns will call the EndDoWork() (which is the callback that was passed in to the BeginDoWork()).
2) Implementing the event pattern. Her…

MEF (Managed Extensibility Framework), .NET 4, Dependency Injection and Plug-in Development

Almost after .Net 4 was released I remember reading about MEF (Managed Extensibility Framework), this was a framework for developers to compose their application with required dependencies. At first this looks like the Unity Container used for dependency injection, but MEF is much more than a dependency container but there is nothing stopping you from using MEF as a dependency injector.I remember around 5 years back when I was in a project that created a framework that allows developers to plug-in there modules as WinForm screens. The developer would create a set of screens with the intended functionalities and the drop this component in the bin folder of the framework and then will move on to do some painful configurations for the framework to pick up the module. Dropping the component into the bin folder and doing a bit of configuration is all that s needed for the framework to pick up display the screens. Typically, the configurations would also contain metadata about the screen.Al…