Skip to main content

Simple factory, Dependency Injection and Unity

Someone asked me the question whether a simple factory can be implemented using dependency injection container. The example he bought up is where a simple factory takes in a string and switches this string to return the correct instance of the object needed....I am talking about something like this.

internal IWaterMarkProvider GetProvider(string fileExtension)


IWaterMarkProvider provider = null;

switch (fileExtension.ToLower())


case "pdf":

provider = new PDFProvider();


case ".docx":

provider = new WordProvider();


case "pptx":

provider = new PPTProvider();


case "xlsx":

provider = new ExcelProvider();



return provider;


The answer was yes..So, if you are using Microsoft Unity (a dependency injection container), you would have your configuration file like this...



<section name="unity" type="Microsoft.Practices.Unity.Configuration.UnityConfigurationSection, Microsoft.Practices.Unity.Configuration"/>


<unity xmlns="">

<container name="providerContainer">

<register type="TestLibrary.IWaterMarkProvider,TestLibrary" name="docx" mapTo="TestLibrary.WordProvider,TestLibrary" />

<register type="TestLibrary.IWaterMarkProvider,TestLibrary" name="pdf" mapTo="TestLibrary.PDFProvider,TestLibrary" />

<register type="TestLibrary.IWaterMarkProvider,TestLibrary" name="pptx" mapTo="TestLibrary.PPTProvider,TestLibrary" />

<register type="TestLibrary.IWaterMarkProvider,TestLibrary" name="xlsx" mapTo="TestLibrary.ExcelProvider,TestLibrary" />




We are basically configuring a Unity container and configuring "named" registrations for the IWaterMarkProvider interface. So for an example, the named registration "docx" is mapped to the WordProvider. Hence when we resolve an instance for the IWaterMarkProvider passing the file extension "docx", the Unity container will create an instance of the WordProvider class.
The code below shows how to do this....

IUnityContainer container = new UnityContainer().LoadConfiguration("providerContainer");

IWaterMarkProvider provider = container.Resolve<IWaterMarkProvider>(fileType);


Note that "providerContainer" is the name of the container specified in the configuration file.
The "fileType" is a parameter that holds the type of the file e.g. "docx"
Whats the advantage of this approach to the approach that we initial put forward, that is with the simple factory we implemened in the first code listing?
First, the code for creation of these classes are "outsourced" and responbility of the container
Secondly, the providers can be changed without recompiling the source, this is even true when we add a new file type. We can just configure it on the configuration file.
Thirdly, If these providers depend on other types, the container will take care of injecting these types into the provider.
Another advantage (unreleated to this example) of using Unity, is that it promotes loose coupling. This becomes really easy when mocking while unit testing. As you can just point Unity to your mocks rather then the real dependencies.

Also note that the lifetime of the instances created through the container can be controlled. By default, each call to the container will create a new instance, if you want to have the WordProvider be a singleton, you can do this...

<register type="TestLibrary.IWaterMarkProvider,TestLibrary" name="docx" mapTo="TestLibrary.WordProvider,TestLibrary" >

<lifetime type="singleton"/>



Popular posts from this blog

Hosting WCF services on IIS or Windows Services?

There came one of those questions from the client whether to use II7 hosting or windows service hosting for WCF services. I tried recollecting a few points and thought of writing it down.
WCF applications can be hosted in 2 main ways- In a Windows service- On IIS 7 and aboveWhen WCF was first released, IIS 6 did not support hosting WCF applications that support Non-HTTP communication like Net.TCP or Net.MSMQ and developers had to rely on hosting these services on Windows Services.With the release of IIS 7, it was possible to deploy these Non-Http based applications also on IIS 7. Following are the benefits of using IIS 7 to host WCF applications
Less development effort
Hosting on Windows service, mandates the creating of a Windows service installer project on windows service and writing code to instantiate the service, whereas the service could just be hosted on IIS by creating an application on IIS, no further development is needed, just the service implementation is n…

Task based Asynchronous pattern, Async & Await and .NET 4.5

One of the key features in .Net 4.5 is to write asynchronous programs much easier. So if I was to write asynchronous programs in .Net 2.0/3.5, I would either follow the event based model or the callback based model. For an example, a synchronous method that does intensive work (say the DoWork()) can be made asynchronous by using the following patterns
1) Implementing the IAsyncResult pattern. in this implementation, 2 methods are exposed for the DoWork() synchronous method, the BeginDoWork() and the EndDoWork() method. The user will call the BeingDoWork() passing in the required parameters and a callback of the delegate type AsyncCallback(IAsyncResult). The BeginDoWork() will spawn a new thread a return control back to the user. Once work is completed in the spawned method, as a last step, it will call the inform the AsyncResult implementation, which in turns will call the EndDoWork() (which is the callback that was passed in to the BeginDoWork()).
2) Implementing the event pattern. Her…

MEF (Managed Extensibility Framework), .NET 4, Dependency Injection and Plug-in Development

Almost after .Net 4 was released I remember reading about MEF (Managed Extensibility Framework), this was a framework for developers to compose their application with required dependencies. At first this looks like the Unity Container used for dependency injection, but MEF is much more than a dependency container but there is nothing stopping you from using MEF as a dependency injector.I remember around 5 years back when I was in a project that created a framework that allows developers to plug-in there modules as WinForm screens. The developer would create a set of screens with the intended functionalities and the drop this component in the bin folder of the framework and then will move on to do some painful configurations for the framework to pick up the module. Dropping the component into the bin folder and doing a bit of configuration is all that s needed for the framework to pick up display the screens. Typically, the configurations would also contain metadata about the screen.Al…